The Volante's Political Blog

Politics from the USD campus

Politicians Play with Personal Freedom

with 3 comments

This week in The Volante print edition, in order to give students a better understanding of the 2008 South Dakota ballot, I have laid out what the seven constitutional amendments and initiatives are and what they are about.

This task got me to thinking about what isn’t on the ballot. The two things that come to mind are the video lottery and smoking ban concerns. I feel it is unfortunate that these debated issues didn’t make the ballot. Citizen passed legislation, in my opinion, is preferred to politician passed legislation when it comes to issues concerning personal freedoms; and the mentioned issues being left off the ballot only invites the state legislature to do its own tampering with our freedom.

When it comes to video lottery, I can be somewhat at ease; being that every push for a ban has failed since the conception of video lottery in 1987. Not to mention the state makes bank off of video lottery taxes. You have to believe everyone at the capitol likes playing with that chunk of change.

The smoking ban issue, however, is in jeopardy of being resolved in Pierre and not by South Dakotans. One reason for the notion: Iowa and Minnesota have recently implemented smoking ban in bars and restaurants, which will most definitely put pressure on South Dakota legislators to do the same.

I am not saying whether or not smoking bans should be put in place in South Dakota; I am merely suggesting freedom issues are better off left up to the masses the freedoms pertain to. Let’s hope there are enough folks in Pierre that think like me, right?    

Written by joesneve

October 15, 2008 at 4:52 am

Posted in politics

3 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. First of all, don’t count out Iowa. Second, you have NO idea the financial devastation from smoking bans. Ask Ohio. Since the smoking ban, and YES since the ban, the hospitality and leisure industry, which was projected to GAIN 10,000 jobs, is now the LARGEST industry impacted by unemployment. In fact, Ohio’s unemployment is 7.2%, the highest it’s been since 1992. Hospitality and Leisure not only lead as #1, they BEAT Trade, Utilities and Transportation (with high fuel costs) COMBINED.

    Ohio liquor permit holders lost 67.44 million dollars in potential sales the 1st year of the ban which meant a loss of potentially 4.3 million dollars in sales and use tax collections. 313 “drinking places” (not places that serve food) ceased paying sales taxes in 2007 (they either kept the taxes or closed their doors).

    You want the same for South Dakota? I hope you have a large reserve of unemployment money built up.

    Deanna S.

    October 16, 2008 at 12:14 am

  2. This letter, from a non-smoker, refers to all anti-smoking bans.

    *An open letter that was emailed to all (103) Ontario, Canada political MPP’s in early May, 2008. No replies!

    Betrayal, Anti-Smoking Message is Like Fascism that Preys Upon Our Children

    We must not look within ourselves. We may discover what we are becoming!

    Moral judgement is the mirror, mirror, on the wall image, always lurking in our mind, like an alter-conscience, prepared to reveal the frightening truth, in our soul, such as the undeserved vengefulness, at any cost, wielded against smokers. Even betrayal, of the next generation, becomes palatable within self-betrayal.

    This remorseless mental/emotional preying upon, our precious children, recklessly poisons their mind and spirit, under the government’s pernicious slogan “health and safety.”

    By supporting anti-smoking, we endorse and promote Fascism, an historically proven scurvy upon humanity!

    The inevitable shame, of our past actions, can still be averted, by rescinding this government agenda!

    The most”dangerous smoke” comes not from cigarettes, instead from the government smoke screen to obscure from view, that the real issue is Capitalism and science versus Fascism and politicized environmentalism, not ‘health and safety.’

    Science and politicized environmentalism are colliding worlds, science being the height of pursuing truth, politicized environmentalism the depth of distorting truth. Anti-smoking is part of politicized environmentalism and the attempted foundation of Fascism!

    Do we therefore side with Capitalism, science, Second World War troops and our allies– honour; or do we side with Fascism, politicized environmentalism, our enemies of the Second World War– disgrace? Thus far we blindly follow our enemies and disgrace!

    From the mouth of Paul Watson, co-founder of Greenpeace, “It doesn’t matter what is true; it only matters what people believe is true…..You are what the media define you to be. Greenpeace became a myth and a myth-generating machine.” We deserve truth, not half-truths and propaganda!

    For any high ranking government official that lack this critical knowledge, they are in their office under false pretenses. They are unprepared to govern. Their present course of anti-smoking legislations is the proof of that statement.

    In the words of Psychotherapist Nathaniel Branden, “I was acutely conscious of the pressure to ‘adapt’ and to absorb the values of the ‘tribe’—family, community and culture. It seemed to me that what was asked was the surrender of my judgement and also my conviction that my life and what I made of it was of the highest possible value. I saw my contemporaries surrendering and losing their fire. Why was growing up equated with giving up?”

    Philosopher/Novelist Ayn Rand wrote, “If some demagogue were to offer us, as a guiding creed, the following tenets: that statistics should be substituted for truth, vote-counting for principles, numbers for rights, and public polls for morality–that pragmatic, range-of-the-moment expediency should be the criterion of a country’s interests, and that the number of its adherents should be the criterion of an idea’s truth or falsehood–that any desire of any nature whatsoever should be accepted as a valid claim, provided it is held by a sufficient number of people–that a majority may do anything it pleases to a minority–in short, gang rule and mob rule–if a demagogue were to offer it, he would not get very far. Yet all of it is contained in–and camouflaged by–the notion of ‘Government by Consensus.”

    ‘Rule by Consensus,’ (Rule by health care pressure group) is todays’ anti-ideology in government. Appeasement of these power-lusting, health care pressure groups is of higher priority than our children and all other tax payers, voters, and citizens. The permeating emotion from ‘Rule by Consensus’ is demoralizing, debilitating fear instead of an optimistic view of the future.

    Note this recent example, Ontario Premier Dalton McGuinty said he wouldn’t entertain a ban (smoking in cars with children) because it amounts to “too much intrusion into people’s private lives.” The logical interpretation of this statement is that the entire anti-smoking movement eliminates smoker’s individual rights, and has always been an intrusion into a smoker’s family dynamic. Now, the Ontario government is prepared, in predictable flip-flop fashion, to enact such a ban.

    In ignobility, many people have misaligned themself with politicized environmentalism, despite the fact that 1930’s, 1940’s, Germany used “politicized ecology and public health” to base its rationalizations. Are we predisposed to mistakenly mirror the historic footsteps of self-loathing mass destruction? No! Everyone has an individual mind and conscience, above party politics. Be true to them, follow your courage (truth) and dethrone your fear (fallacy). Rescind this government’s shameful anti-smoking agenda.

    References:

    Paul Watson – Environmental Overkill, (Whatever happened to common sense) – book
    Psychotherapist Nathaniel Branden, The Six Pillars of Self-Esteem – book
    Ayn Rand – Capitalism: The Unknown Ideal – book

    Ken Hill

    November 23, 2008 at 8:51 pm

  3. Government Will Make Smokers, Children, Families, Sick

    Government’s that foster anti-smoking policies lead the real health epidemic, government interference. They are not using science as their competent guide into the future. Instead they use the deep festering envy of politicized environmentalists (those unable to compete on a level playing field) to revisit remnants of the dark ages. The profound statement of philosopher/novelist Ayn Rand echoes the truth that smothers us, “Today, we live in the age of envy.”

    I am a life-long non-smoker, who has lost the four most precious people in my life. Cancer was the effect, a consequence, but not the cause. Yet, I will not help to propagandize health into dictatorial policy through anti-smoking. I do not wish to repeat the 1930’s, 1940’s. Do you?

    Exactly how can our government “create a healthier society for all” when they betray the smoker’s sense of trust, demoralize their self-confidence, disrupt their employer-employee relationships, upheave their family life, and undermind their efficacy by alienating them from their own human nature?

    This destructive mind/body dichotomy will subject smoker’s to long-term emotional and mental disorders, thus leading to serious physical ailments. In reality, our government is making them sick.

    A particularily foreboding feature of the mind/body dichotomy is the government’s suffocating negative influence while aggressively restricting young people from making their own decisions. Government aggression will severely jeopardize each young person’s struggle to form a necessary sense of self-confidence. This fragile process is usually a traumatic experience, especially when that negative influence is hidden under the misconception of government benevolence.

    In reality, our government lacks the knowledge of the trigger mechanism that sets off most cancers or most other major diseases to then become a critical danger for human beings. It is not smoking, nor second-hand smoke. Then why does government pathetically use smoker’s as their scapegoat, perhaps they require an example in order to intimidate other industries?

    Chicken Littleism is no longer a silly joke. It is now a snarling threat. Stamp out politicized environmentalism, not smokers.

    Ken Hill

    November 23, 2008 at 8:56 pm


Leave a Reply